Description: The ALKA Corridor shape file was produced to be used by County and State agencies to reference where Ala Kahakai NHT is interested in reviewing and commenting on projects that could affect ancient and historic trails, and their potential incorporation into a public trail system, in partnership with ALKA, NAH, and County. This corridor reflects to some extent the ALKA Comprehensive Management Plan (CMP), and the inclusion of mauka-makai trails as requested by Kupuna during the CMP/EIS process.
Service Item Id: b2f8fffa0ca7402eb6bc87c3a8069c7f
Copyright Text: Ala Kahakai National Historic Trail
Description: This 1:24,000-scale layer includes polygons which represent the Wisconsin Natural Resources (NR) Board Approved Ice Age Trail Corridor. The corridor is based on an ongoing planning process that is led by the National Park Service and includes the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Ice Age Trail Alliance, county and local governments, private landowners, and volunteers. Most of the Trail's eventual route is not represented in this layer since no corridor has been approved for many areas. The intent of the corridor is to show an area within which the Trail will hopefully pass in the future. It is understood that no effort will be made to acquire all lands within the corridor. Only willing landowners participate in the completion of the trail.
Description: This is a vector polygon showing the Designated trail alignment of the Juan Bautista de Anza National Historic Trail as depicted in the 1996 Comprehensive Management and Use Plan for the Anza Trail. The purpose of this feature service is to show the location of Designated trail alignment of the Juan Bautista de Anza National Historic Trail. The intended use of all data in the trail GIS library is to support diverse trail administration activities including planning, management, maintenance, research, and interpretation.The 1,200-mile Juan Bautista de Anza National Historic Trail commemorates the Spanish colonial Anza Expedition of 1775-76 and the first non-Native families to journey overland into California. Today, the Anza Trail connects historic, cultural, and recreation sites across Arizona and California that reveal a legacy of our country's Hispanic heritage. As a program of the National Park Service, the National Park Service administers the Anza Trail from the U.S. border at Nogales, Ariz., to the San Francisco Bay Area. The National Park Service does not own or manage any land or resources associated with the trail (except where the trail intersects with National Parks); rather, we work in partnership with federal, state, county, city, and other public agencies, as well as non-profit organizations, private landowners, volunteers, and others who maintain, build, certify, protect, and interpret the Anza Trail.
Description: The term “high potential historic sites” means those historic sites related to the route or sites in close proximity thereto, which provide opportunity to interpret the historic significance of the trail during the period of its major use. Criteria for consideration as highpotential sites include historic significance, presence of visible historic remnants, scenic quality, and relative freedom from intrusion.-Section 12 of the National Trails System ActTo qualify as a high potential historic site, a site must meet criteria summarized as follows.Battlefields, Structures, Archeological Sites, Cultural Landscapes (exclusive of scenic resources), and Commemorative SitesWar of 1812 historic and archeological resources identified as battlefields, structures, archeological sites, cultural landscapes (exclusive of evocative landscapes), and commemorative sites in the Star-Spangled Banner Trail – Inventory of War of 1812 Cultural Resources (NPS 2011e) are candidate high potential historic sites along the trail. In order to be designated a high potential historic site, a resource must meet all of the following criteria:Important Historic Associations. The resource must have important and documented historic associations with the War of 1812 and/or the 1812-1815 time period.Historic Significance. The resource must be a national historic landmark and/or listed on the National Register of Historic Places or officially determined eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. Battlefields, structures, archeological sites, cultural landscapes (exclusive of evocative natural landscapes), and commemorative sites are also considered if they have a combined significance and integrity ranking of five or six in the Star-Spangled Banner Trail – Inventory of War of 1812 Cultural Resources (NPS 2011e),Opportunity to Interpret Trail Themes. The resource must provide opportunities to tell stories that relate the resource to the War of 1812 time period. As described in the Star-Spangled Banner National Historic Trail Interpretive Plan (NPS 2011c), these stories fall into four categories that reflect the ideas and concepts critical to understanding and appreciating the significance of and resources associated with the War of 1812:military events in the Chesapeake Bay region during the War of 1812individuals residing in the Chesapeake Bay region who were affected by the events of the War of 1812the natural resources of the Chesapeake Bay region and the hubs for trade, industry, and government in the early 19th century that evolved and were sustained by those resourcesthe United States flag, “The Star-Spangled Banner” anthem, and the continuum of citizen efforts over time to memorialize and preserve events, people, battlefields, buildings, and other icons related to the War of 1812Accessibility to the Public. The site must be publicly accessible. It can be either publicly-owned or privatelyowned. If the site is privately-owned then the landowner must have granted permanent or regular access to the site.Cultural Landscapes along the Trail Routes that are Highly Evocative of the Early 19th CenturyCultural landscapes along the trail route whose settings are highly evocative of the early 19th century are candidate high potential historic sites. To be designated a high potential historic site such a cultural landscape must meet the following criteria:Scenic Quality and Relative Freedom from Intrusion. A site along the trail route that is highly evocative of the early 19th century must have a setting that is generally free from intrusion by modern development, offering visitors an opportunity to vicariously share what Americans and British experienced during the War of 1812 in the Chesapeake Bay region. Distant areas along the horizon and shoreline areas should be generally evocative of the early 19th century, primarily composed of wetland or forest vegetation, agricultural land, and/or historic structures with only minor alterations. New development, such as piers and docks or modern structures, can be minimally present, but must notsignificantly diminish the ability of visitors to vicariously experience a setting reminiscent of what people in the early 19th century might have experienced. It is possible that a site could satisfy this criterion if it is suitable for management actions that would restore its evocative character.
Service Item Id: b2f8fffa0ca7402eb6bc87c3a8069c7f
Copyright Text: Star-Spangled Banner National Historic Trail National Park Service Chesapeake Bay Office
410 Severn Avenue, Suite 314
Annapolis, MD 21403
Description: The USGS Protected Areas Database of the United States (PAD-US) is the nation's inventory of protected areas, including public land and voluntarily provided private protected areas, identified as an A-16 National Geospatial Data Asset in the Cadastre Theme (https://communities.geoplatform.gov/ngda-cadastre/). The PAD-US is an ongoing project with several published versions of a spatial database including areas dedicated to the preservation of biological diversity, and other natural (including extraction), recreational, or cultural uses, managed for these purposes through legal or other effective means. The database was originally designed to support biodiversity assessments; however, its scope expanded in recent years to include all public and nonprofit lands and waters. Most are public lands owned in fee; however, long-term easements, leases, agreements, Congressional (e.g. 'Wilderness Area'), Executive (e.g. 'National Monument'), and administrative designations (e.g. 'Area of Critical Environmental Concern') documented in agency management plans are also included. The PAD-US strives to be a complete inventory of public land and other protected areas, compiling “best available” data provided by managing agencies and organizations. The PAD-US geodatabase maps and describes areas with over twenty-five attributes in nine feature classes to support data management, queries, web mapping services, and analyses. This PAD-US Version 2.0 dataset includes a variety of updates and changes from the previous Version 1.4 dataset. The following list summarizes major updates and changes: 1) Expanded database structure with new layers: the geodatabase feature class structure now includes nine feature classes separating fee owned lands, conservation (and other) easements, management designations overlapping fee lands, marine areas, proclamation boundaries and various 'Combined' feature classes (e.g. 'Fee' + 'Easement' + 'Designation' feature classes); 2) Major update of the Federal estate including data from 8 agencies, developed in collaboration with the Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) Federal Lands Working Group (FLWG, https://communities.geoplatform.gov/ngda-govunits/federal-lands-workgroup/); 3) Major updates to 30 States and limited additions to 16 other States; 4) Integration of The Nature Conservancy's (TNC) Secured Lands geodatabase; 5) Integration of Ducks Unlimited's (DU) Conservation and Recreation Lands (CARL) database; 6) Integration of The Trust for Public Land's (TPL) Conservation Almanac database; 7) The Nature Conservancy (TNC) Lands database update: the national source of lands owned in fee or managed by TNC; 8) National Conservation Easement Database (NCED) update: complete update of non-sensitive (suitable for publication in the public domain) easements; 9) Complete National Marine Protected Areas (MPA) update: from the NOAA MPA Inventory, including conservation measure ('GAP Status Code', 'IUCN Category') review by NOAA; 10) First integration of Bureau of Energy Ocean Management (BOEM) managed marine lands: BOEM submitted Outer Continental Shelf Area lands managed for natural resources (minerals, oil and gas), a significant and new addition to PAD-US; 11) Fee boundary overlap assessment: topology overlaps in the PAD-US 2.0 'Fee' feature class have been identified and are available for user and data-steward reference (See Logical_Consistency_Report Section). For more information regarding the PAD-US dataset please visit, https://usgs.gov/gapanalysis/PAD-US/. For more information about data aggregation please review the “Data Manual for PAD-US” available at https://www.usgs.gov/core-science-systems/science-analytics-and-synthesis/gap/pad-us-data-manual .
Service Item Id: b2f8fffa0ca7402eb6bc87c3a8069c7f
Copyright Text: U.S. Geological Survey, Gap Analysis Project (GAP), Sept. 2018, Protected Areas Database of the United States (PADUS), Version 2.0 Combined Feature Class
Own_Name
(
type: esriFieldTypeString, alias: Owner Name, length: 70
, Coded Values:
[TVA: Tennessee Valley Authority]
, [BLM: Bureau of Land Management]
, [BOEM: Bureau of Ocean Energy Management]
, ...41 more...
)
Loc_Own
(
type: esriFieldTypeString, alias: Local Owner, length: 250
)
Mang_Name
(
type: esriFieldTypeString, alias: Manager Name, length: 70
, Coded Values:
[TVA: Tennessee Valley Authority]
, [BLM: Bureau of Land Management]
, [BOEM: Bureau of Ocean Energy Management]
, ...41 more...
)
Loc_Mang
(
type: esriFieldTypeString, alias: Local Manager, length: 250
)